(1) Write a "nobody knows" poem, and
(2) Write a poem in the form of a review.
So here's the deal. I know I still want to write a "serious" poem today because the judge at Poetic Asides is Marge Piercy, one of my favorite poets, with whom I worked for a week in a workshop a few summers ago, and whom I know best of all this month's judges. (See my prior blog entry here for a chronicle of my experience, one of the best weeks I ever spent with poetry.) But I had so much fun responding to the NaPoWriMo prompt that I had to post it early. I'll post another poem later once it comes to me. This may not qualify as a "poem", and it's certainly not a serious trashing of one my favorite poets of all time, but like I said, it was fun.
Poetry Review
so much depends
upon
a
red wheel
barrow
glazed
with rain
water
beside
the white
chickens
William
Carlos Williams’ latest poem is a study
in obfuscation.
How
can only sixteen words
(or
fifteen, if one reconnects the maddeningly dissected “wheelbarrow”)
be
so obscure and confusing?
He
begins with a statement that “so much depends”
on
this piece of farm equipment. What exactly does depend on it?
Apparently,
it’s been left out in the rain –
an
object thus abandoned would seem to have outlived
its
utility, in this humble writer’s opinion.
Methinks
that not much really depends
on
a wheeled hopper left to rust in the elements.
And
why state the obvious regarding the hue of this device?
Everyone
knows that wheelbarrows are red.
Regarding
the glazing by rain, of what other substance
would
rain be composed other than water?
This
writer has never seen motor oil or orange juice
fall
from the sky. The fact that it sits
beside the white chickens
seems
trivial and coincidental at best.
Of
course there are chickens – this is a farm, for pity’s sake.
And
is it really significant that they are white?
The
unusual line breaks only further confound the issues
in
the poem, the aforementioned fracture of “wheelbarrow”
being
one such example. Conceits such as this
only help perpetuate
the
distressing trends in today’s poetry, which include
the
abandonment of classical themes, rhyme and meter,
and
even sensible, syntactical arrangement of the words.
If
Dr. Williams were not so busy with his medical practice,
and
used paper larger than a prescription pad,
perhaps
he would have had time to produce a longer,
more
substantial poem. As it stands, it is chopped up
like
a salad. It could be simplified just by eliminating
the
line breaks and unnecessary words:
So
much depends upon a wheelbarrow glazed with rain beside the chickens.
Congratulations,
Dr. Williams – you have written a sentence.
But
then we come back to the enigmatic question:
What
depends on that goddamned wheelbarrow?
This
writer has lost sleep the last three nights attempting
to
decipher its meaning. I guess we will never know.
-
Reginald Overcrom, The Fusty Review of Literature, December
1962.
2 comments:
Bruce, as a lover of WCW, I simply love this. LOVE. So clever.
If you have not already read "Love that Dog" by Sharon Creech, I highly recommend it. It does shed a little gentle light. ;)
Oh, brilliant! It isn't, of course, Dr Bill you've trashed, but that detestable creature, lit crit. Which as far as I'm concerned deserves all the trashing it can get.
Post a Comment